Greinke Makes MLB History

You can interpret my prediction however you want. I presented an ongoing interpretation of the events as they happened. The point I was making in this post was that the prediction I made was at the END OF THE YEAR - after all the data was in.

You are right that I was wrong about needing 18 wins. I readily admit it. What's the problem? I never said I wasn't wrong about it? I wasn't making the point that I had done something amazing by predicting Greinke to win (DUH). Anyone could have done that. My point (and only point) was that he got even more votes than I predicted. That's self-deprecating, but you wouldn't understand that.

Clearly, you fail to recognize the on-going process of narrowing down the ALCY winner via all the posts I did on the subject. That's an evolutionary process - not just a first shot across the bow on August 28th. In several posts leading up to the end of the season, I stated that he was the favorite. All you have to do is read. Oops, that would be "drivel".

As to reading this "drivel", I can't imagine why you would. I wouldn't waste one millionth of a second on something I thought was drivel and I sure wouldn't waste one millionth of a second blabbering about it.

And, as to "There are few people in the world who understand or interpret sports statistical data as well as I do." I stand by what I wrote, but I hadn't looked at that in over a year - since the day we began UFR. Just because it offends you, I will modify it.

Actually, I couldn't care less what you think, but I modified it anyway - especially since Brad is no longer here.

Martin

You are correct. Thanks.

I didn't have access to the AP this afternoon and I took the numbers from the text of a story and missed the two first place votes for Sabathia. Now, it works out.

Martin